Chúng ta vẫn luôn để ý tới việc tẩy da chết cho mặt mà quên rằng vùng da phần môi cũng cần được “dọn dẹp” hàng tuần. Lớp da chết sẽ khiến môi thâm xỉn và khô ráp, do vậy muốn trị thâm môi và mang màu môi ửng hồng, bạn đừng quên bước quan trọng này nhé!
Phân tích thêm:Phun môi giá bao nhiêu để không bị hớ, môi lên màu tự nhiên?
các tác nhân như bụi bẩn, khói thuốc hay tuổi tác và sức khỏe làm đôi môi bạn thường xuyên bị khô tróc và không giữ được sắc hồng tươi tắn.
Để lấy lại nét đẹp cho cặp môi, bạn nên chăm nom môi ngay trong khoảng hiện giờ với những mẹo nhỏ sau đây.
xem thêm:phun môi ở đâu đẹp
các phương pháp khiến môi đỏ thiên nhiên nhanh nhất ko tốn kém mà bạn có thể tự làm tại nhà để khôi phục lại sắc đỏ, sự căng mọng và vẻ trẻ trung vốn với của đôi môi vốn đã bị những ảnh hưởng xấu trong khoảng môi trường như ánh sáng mặt trời và từ 1 số thói quen xấu do chính bản thân chúng ta tạo ra như sử dụng son môi ko đúng cách, kém chất lương, thường xuyên ăn uống đồ hot,thói quen cắn, liếm môi….dần dần lấy đi màu đỏ ngẫu nhiên của đôi môi, thay vào đấy là đôi môi thâm, nứt nẻ khiến cho gương mặt trông lợt lạt, không còn được tươi tắn.
nguồn:phun môi màu đỏ cam

I'm speaking as a gamer whose main interest are tactics & strategy games.

I find it a bit sad that some of the most popular games out there (I'm particularly looking at you, HOI/CK/EU) seem to use 3D just for the sake of using 3D. These games don't exploit the benefits of the third dimension yet they come with all the potential detriments: to my eyes the engine Paradox uses has no clarity or beauty to it. All I can see are small and clunky-looking 3D models thrown chaotically  over the map. I'd much prefer a hand-crafted 2d map over this. For example, I found the maps of the earlier AGEOD titles so rich of character, beautiful and clear. Just compare these maps (EU, AGEODS WiA, Command Ops 2):
 

So, my point is that strategy games can really benefit from the clarity and character that 2d can provide more easily than 3d. Unless a game makes proper use of the third dimension - that is, if it features some kind "action" and the player is allowed to choose the camera-position while watching the action - I see no reason to use 3D. Then again some RTS out there fulfill these requirements but are so fast-paced that the player has no time to "watch" the action anyway because he's busy clicking all the time. Choosing a "cool" camera angle takes time and thus is a detriment to competitive gameplay. In these cases I guess 3D's main purpose is to deliver impressive marketing-pictures?  

1 hour ago, Mogli said:

seem to use 3D just for the sake of using 3D. These games don't exploit the benefits of the third dimension

3D graphics is more optimal and saves time. For example if you have a 2D character that can move in 8 directions, then every animation you make has to have 8 sets for every direction.

With 3D you only make a animation once and can use it in every direction.

3D also makes math involving height easier. So games with archer projectiles is easier in 3D.

The examples you show are cluttered because of design choice not art choice. This happens a lot, where a artist is told to do some special effect that makes no sense.

Design choices is what matters here. You can get a clear look using both 3D and 2D if that is your aim.

On 5/3/2018 at 3:22 PM, Scouting Ninja said:

3D graphics is more optimal and saves time. For example if you have a 2D character that can move in 8 directions, then every animation you make has to have 8 sets for every direction.

With 3D you only make a animation once and can use it in every direction.

3D also makes math involving height easier. So games with archer projectiles is easier in 3D.

 

The examples you show are cluttered because of design choice not art choice. This happens a lot, where a artist is told to do some special effect that makes no sense.

Design choices is what matters here. You can get a clear look using both 3D and 2D if that is your aim.

I second this ,I switched from 2d to 3d even for simple games that have fixed perspective because it allows me to save time and resources, and i decided this while making a tower defense game as it became obvious how much time i would need to generate each character sprite sheet to allow them to move and have different animations(death,attack) in every direction , in 3d i make the animation on the pose and then import it in the game and it is done , consider for 2d i would have to do this and then render all the sprites make sprite sheets import in engine, define each animation etc etc etc...